Andrea Motta vs Noah Thurner Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W W L W L W W W L
Form
L W L W L W L W W LHead-2-Head: Motta 1 - 0 Thurner
They have played 3 sets in total, with Motta winning 2 and Thurner winning 1. The last match between Motta and Thurner was at the M15 Foggia, 24-03-2025, Q3, Clay with Andrea Motta getting the victory 7-6(6) 2-6 10-6.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Andrea Motta | 1 |
| Noah Thurner | 0 |
M15 Foggia(24-03-2025)
7
6
2
6
10
6
| Motta | Stats | Thurner |
|---|---|---|
| 54% (7-6) | YTD Win/Loss | 64% (18-10) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| N/A | Ranking | N/A |
| Highest Rank | N/A | |
| 21 | Age | 25 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 0 | Titles | 0 |
| 45% (13-16) | Career Total W/L | 44% (87-110) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Maneiro VS Frech PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Agut VS Clar PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
22 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(6) 2-6 10-6 |
Stats 
Andrea Motta
Player
Noah Thurner
59%
(
38 of
64)
1st Serve %
65%
(
47 of
72)
1
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
7
68%
(
26 of
38)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
33 of
47)
42%
(
11 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
42%
(
27 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
27 of
72)
64
Total Points Won
72
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 19 | Games Won | 18 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 5 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 7 |
| 1:51:32 | Average Match Time | 1:51:32 |
| 59% (38/64) | 1st Serve % | 65% (47/72) |
| 68% (26/38) | 1st Serve Win % | 70% (33/47) |
| 42% (11/26) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (12/25) |
| 33% (1/3) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 100% (3/3) |
| 38% (27/72) | Return Points Win % | 42% (27/64) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Andrea Motta Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Lilian Marmousez
Player
Andrea Motta
70%
(
32 of
46)
1st Serve %
60%
(
32 of
53)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
6
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
36%
(
5 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
14%
(
3 of
21)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
35%
(
16 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
34 of
53)
64
Total Points Won
35
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Andrea Motta
Player
Alessandro Mondazzi
60%
(
39 of
65)
1st Serve %
53%
(
35 of
66)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
67%
(
26 of
39)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
35%
(
23 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
30 of
66)
72
Total Points Won
59
|
2-6 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Andrea Motta
Player
Noah Thurner
59%
(
38 of
64)
1st Serve %
65%
(
47 of
72)
1
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
7
68%
(
26 of
38)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
33 of
47)
42%
(
11 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
42%
(
27 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
27 of
72)
64
Total Points Won
72
|
7-6(6) 2-6 10-6 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Andrea Motta
Player
Matteo Vavassori
56%
(
24 of
43)
1st Serve %
71%
(
27 of
38)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
79%
(
19 of
24)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
22 of
27)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
7 of
11)
0%
(
0 of
2)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
14 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
24%
(
9 of
38)
38
Total Points Won
43
|
4-6 6-3 12-10 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Taisei Ichikawa
Player
Andrea Motta
62%
(
36 of
58)
1st Serve %
47%
(
24 of
51)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
83%
(
20 of
24)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
31%
(
18 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
22 of
51)
62
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Andrea Motta
Player
Chun-Ming Yam
57%
(
33 of
58)
1st Serve %
67%
(
50 of
75)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
85%
(
28 of
33)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
35 of
50)
76%
(
19 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
19%
(
11 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
27 of
75)
74
Total Points Won
59
|
4-6 6-3 10-8 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tianhui Zhang
Player
Andrea Motta
69%
(
36 of
52)
1st Serve %
56%
(
32 of
57)
4
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
86%
(
31 of
36)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
25%
(
13 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
25 of
57)
64
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF | 4-6 6-1 10-1 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-4 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
view more
Noah Thurner Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Lorenzo Carboni
Player
Noah Thurner
68%
(
44 of
65)
1st Serve %
55%
(
26 of
47)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
68%
(
30 of
44)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
18 of
26)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
34%
(
22 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
20 of
47)
63
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Noah Thurner
Player
Champion Okey
64%
(
58 of
91)
1st Serve %
50%
(
44 of
88)
2
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
12
64%
(
37 of
58)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
29 of
44)
42%
(
14 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
14 of
44)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
44%
(
40 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
45 of
88)
96
Total Points Won
83
|
6-3 7-6(0) | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Andrea Motta
Player
Noah Thurner
59%
(
38 of
64)
1st Serve %
65%
(
47 of
72)
1
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
7
68%
(
26 of
38)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
33 of
47)
42%
(
11 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
42%
(
27 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
27 of
72)
64
Total Points Won
72
|
7-6(6) 2-6 10-6 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Noah Thurner
Player
Carlo Angeli
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve %
70%
(
38 of
54)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
25%
(
10 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
31 of
54)
61
Total Points Won
33
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ishaque Eqbal
Player
Noah Thurner
45%
(
33 of
74)
1st Serve %
69%
(
52 of
75)
5
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
2
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
34 of
52)
59%
(
24 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
34%
(
25 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
30 of
75)
79
Total Points Won
70
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Noah Thurner
Player
Stefan Vujic
75%
(
60 of
80)
1st Serve %
71%
(
55 of
78)
2
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
0
75%
(
45 of
60)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
43 of
55)
75%
(
15 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
15 of
23)
0%
(
0 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
25%
(
20 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
26%
(
20 of
78)
80
Total Points Won
78
|
7-6(3) 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Alexander Donski
Player
Noah Thurner
69%
(
47 of
68)
1st Serve %
65%
(
53 of
82)
15
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
3
77%
(
36 of
47)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
33 of
53)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
32%
(
22 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
34 of
82)
80
Total Points Won
70
|
6-4 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Noah Thurner
Player
Gabriele Volpi
65%
(
35 of
54)
1st Serve %
63%
(
33 of
52)
8
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
0
83%
(
29 of
35)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
22 of
33)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
30%
(
16 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
21 of
52)
59
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tuncay Duran
Player
Noah Thurner
62%
(
63 of
102)
1st Serve %
64%
(
57 of
89)
6
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
8
76%
(
48 of
63)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
42 of
57)
49%
(
19 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
34%
(
35 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
31 of
89)
98
Total Points Won
93
|
4-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 45% (13/16) | Win/Loss | 44% (87/110) |
| 44% (29/37) | Sets Win/Loss | 46% (198/231) |
| 46% (290/336) | Games Win/Loss | 48% (2002/2126) |
| 40% (6/9) | Hard Win/Loss | 46% (32/38) |
| 54% (7/6) | Clay Win/Loss | 45% (47/57) |
| 0% (0/1) | Indoor Hard W/L | 35% (8/15) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.06 | Aces Per Game | 0.09 |
| 17 | Aces Total | 187 |
| 0.09 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.17 |
| 27 | Total Double Faults | 335 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 131.66 | Average Opponent Rank | 212 |
| 58% (394/684) | 1st Serve % | 68% (3416/5044) |
| 66% (259/394) | 1st Serve Win % | 64% (2199/3416) |
| 46% (132/290) | 2nd Serve Win % | 43% (700/1628) |
| 34% (15/44) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 44% (204/464) |
| 35% (224/642) | Return Points Win % | 39% (1951/4953) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 45% (13/16) | Futures W/L | 44% (87/110) |
| 45% (13/29) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 45% (87/195) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 75% (3/4) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 51% (25/49) |
| 63% (5/8) | Deciding Set Win % | 35% (13/37) |
| 82% (11/9) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 83% (98/81) |
| 18% (11/2) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 17% (98/17) |
| 22% (18/4) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 6% (99/6) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
